Magnetic Susceptibility Formula:
From: | To: |
Magnetic susceptibility is a dimensionless proportionality constant that indicates the degree of magnetization of a material in response to an applied magnetic field. It quantifies how much a material will become magnetized in an external magnetic field.
The calculator uses the magnetic susceptibility formula:
Where:
Explanation: The formula calculates the magnetic susceptibility by dividing the intensity of magnetization by the magnetic field intensity.
Details: Magnetic susceptibility is crucial for characterizing materials' magnetic properties, classifying materials as diamagnetic, paramagnetic, or ferromagnetic, and in various applications including material science, geology, and medical diagnostics.
Tips: Enter intensity of magnetization and magnetic field intensity in A/m. Both values must be positive, and magnetic field intensity must be greater than zero.
Q1: What are the typical values of magnetic susceptibility?
A: Magnetic susceptibility values vary widely: diamagnetic materials have small negative values, paramagnetic materials have small positive values, and ferromagnetic materials have large positive values.
Q2: Is magnetic susceptibility dimensionless?
A: While often treated as dimensionless in many contexts, magnetic susceptibility has units of H/m (henry per meter) in the SI system when calculated from the given formula.
Q3: How does temperature affect magnetic susceptibility?
A: For paramagnetic materials, susceptibility decreases with increasing temperature (Curie's law), while for diamagnetic materials, it's largely temperature-independent.
Q4: What's the difference between volume and mass susceptibility?
A: Volume susceptibility (as calculated here) is per unit volume, while mass susceptibility is per unit mass. Mass susceptibility = volume susceptibility / density.
Q5: Can this calculator be used for all materials?
A: This calculator uses the basic formula valid for linear magnetic materials. For ferromagnetic materials with nonlinear behavior, more complex models are needed.